Wealth management firms are grappling with cost pressures, uneven market performance, rising consumer expectations as well as an evolving regulatory landscape.
In addition, they have to adapt to policy changes that come into play when governments change.
While the ultra-high net worth individual (UHNWI) segment continues to demand attention, the mass affluent segment has rapidly emerged as a sizeable opportunity. Though this segment accounts for a substantial portion of the United Kingdom’s wealth, it remains underserved mainly because it has not been a major target for wealth management firms. The mass affluent segment is price-sensitive. Traditional wealth management firms with high minimum investment requirements and service fees are therefore not able to meet their needs. Additionally, the traditional advice model with a one-size-fits-all approach to product and service design is not equipped to cater to the constantly changing requirements of the mass affluent segment, which is increasingly seeking personalized solutions delivered through digital channels.
The UK’s mass affluent segment represents a major opportunity for wealth managers and advisers. Firms have developed new models such as robo-advice and hybrid services by leveraging digital advances to offer a cheaper entry point to this segment and reduce the cost to serve. However, firms have not been able to perfect this recipe. Given that consumer expectations are influencing the regulatory agenda as well as customer experience and fees, TCS conducted a survey to gain insights on how wealth management firms can adapt their strategies to capitalize on the mass affluent opportunity. The findings were not only interesting but also eye-opening.
TCS conducted a survey of 920 mass affluent consumers in the UK during Oct-Dec 2023.
The survey covered those with investable assets of £50,000-£500,000 ($63,500-$635,000) to identify the opportunities in this space and help wealth management firms refine their business strategy accordingly. A majority of the respondents were in the 40 to 80 years age group, with similar distribution across genders. A large proportion of the survey respondents had investable assets ranging from £50,000 to £100,000 ($63,500-$127,000). The intent was to draw insights about the following key objectives:
The survey threw up interesting findings.
It showed that most of the mass affluent respondents are comfortable with the use of GenAI in investment product recommendation. Also, the younger segment believes investment product will help them grow their wealth. Here are some of the key findings:
A big factor holding back the mass affluent from investing is the concern about the risks involved and higher advisory fees.
Our research into how mass affluent consumers can be mobilized had two distinct components:
Mobilizing non-investors to invest
We observed that the non-investors tend to have lower investable assets: 75% of the respondents had assets between £50,000-£100,000 ($63,500-$127,500).
For firms seeking to target this customer group, our survey findings indicate that more than two-fifths (43%) of them are open to investing by reducing their savings buffer to less than £100,000 ($127,000). And only a fifth rule out investing altogether.
The survey results also offer a clear picture of what is holding them back: across all generations—barring Gen Z—risk aversion is the top barrier to investing (see Figure 1).
When asked what would encourage them to move money out of cash and savings into investments, nearly a quarter of non-investors cited products that would align with their low tolerance for risk.
Mobilizing self-directed investors to use advice
The UK’s self-directed and DIY investment market has grown rapidly in recent years. Naturally, this cohort represents a big opportunity for wealth managers.
Our survey results suggest that most self-directed investors acknowledge they could benefit from getting advice—less than one in 10 feel that advisers do not add much value. Most self-directed investors say they have chosen to do it by themselves because they think advisers’ fees are too high, their portfolios are not large enough, and the DIY approach is a lot more convenient (see Figure 2).
When asked what would encourage them to seek professional advice, a quarter of self-directed investors cited changes to fee models as the top factor. This indicates that more innovative fee models could convert some self-directed investors into advice users.
Attracting and retaining the mass affluent segment will require a higher degree of personalization.
The well-worn approach to customer service used for the mass market will not suffice. Tailoring customer journeys in alignment with individual customers’ financial goals will be key to building deeper relationships.
Mass affluent consumers’ limited confidence in digital-only models and aversion to high fees associated with traditional human advice suggest a bigger strategic focus on hybrid models is needed.
Pathway analysis: Optimizing the investor journey
Hybrid models look increasingly attractive for financial providers targeting the mass affluent market. Our pathway analysis assesses the extent to which different mass affluent segments need human intervention at each stage of the investment journey.
Our analysis reveals that a majority of respondents are open to a fully digital approach at the fact-finding stage, when being recommended suitable products, and undertaking annual reviews, provided their financial circumstances have not changed.
There are differing degrees of openness to digital across mass affluent sub-segments, but human intervention is most sought at the point of purchase, when financial circumstances change, and when products underperform (see Figures 4, 5, 6).
To make these journeys efficient and ensure they add value for customers, asset and wealth management firms will require a combination of smart technology and well-qualified people.
The mass affluent market is becoming a hotly contested battleground for the industry.
As such, while a substantial amount of firms’ near-term investment must be directed at getting the foundations of their proposition right, it is also important to consider emerging technologies such as GenAI that may help to differentiate them.
Deploying GenAI in the customer journey
Encouragingly for the industry, around half of mass affluent respondents say they are comfortable with GenAI supporting their customer journey in areas such as curating investment content and matching them with channels and products. However, many draw the line at the technology being introduced to run portfolios: only three in 10 say they are open to this (see Figure 7).
Among mass affluent respondents who rate their investment knowledge as strong, more than three-fifths are comfortable with the technology, making them ideal candidates for pilot initiatives.
Our research reveals that mass affluent investors are particular when it comes to financial advice.
They are exacting about the fee model, engagement channel, pace of growth of their investments, risk appetite, among others. In addition, they prefer to independently verify emerging trends and other aspects through online research and by engaging with market voices rather than product providers.
Capturing the mass affluent segment will, therefore, require wealth management firms to embrace a discrete approach with a flexible business model and high degree of personalization. Accomplishing this will come with its own challenges, but the rewards will far outweigh the effort—focused attention on this underserved segment will deliver sustained growth, helping wealth management firms that act quickly to gallop ahead of their peers.
While firms are making efforts to respond to this segment’s needs, a lot more ought to be done especially as regards pricing and business model. So, what specific actions must firms take to capture the mass affluent segment? The detailed report offers valuable insights on how firms can engage this segment. Please write to bfsi.marketing@tcs.com to access the full report.