The distribution of known and anonymous customers in retail is disproportionate.
This is leaving retailers in a tizzy as they are looking to drive similar experiences for all customers. It’s baffling that retailers are going all out to build a 360-degree view for just 10% of their shopper base that has identified itself, while an overwhelming 90% of shoppers continue to remain anonymous, making personalization for all seem like an illusion. This is likely to become more challenging with paradoxical trends such as data deprecation and customers increasingly expecting personalized experiences.
Data deprecation refers to data losing its value over time. There are many forces accelerating data deprecation. These include intentional consumer actions such as ad blocking, closed ecosystems, or walled gardens that disallow access to first-party data and cross-platform customer data exchange. Additionally, third-party cookie restrictions, and privacy regulations such as general data protection regulation (GDPR) also contribute to data depreciation.
Before the ‘cookie apocalypse’, retailers had troves of customer data to power their personalization strategies.
Today, with restricted access to new consumer data, retail businesses make do with whatever data they had acquired earlier, failing to build deeper connections with their customers. Customer expectations are also unique—loyal customers demand exclusivity in terms of offers and services, while new customers are wary about sharing a lot of personal information with brands.
Whether retailers should gear their personalization initiatives only toward known customers is a moot point. However, most retailers focus on elevating the user experience of new users, so that they eventually feel comfortable sharing information about themselves. Retailers can adopt a tiered approach to deliver personalized experiences for all:
Zero-party data refers to data that customers explicitly share with a clear understanding of how retailers will use it.
Examples of zero-party data include information such as communication preferences, product preferences, and personal style provided by customers by participating in polls, surveys, and contests. First-party data is collected by retailers by analyzing or tracking customer interactions with brand. For instance, purchase history, page views, and dwell time. On the other hand, zero-party data is shared by customers, making it more authentic and reliable and helping retailers build the elusive golden record for each customer.
In the future, retailers will need to rely on zero-party data.
Therefore, retailers must learn how to optimize their efforts for marketing ROI with less data. This comes at a critical juncture amid other challenges and opportunities such as heightened customer expectations, a heavy and crumbling MarTech stack, and the emergence of new technologies such as generative AI (GenAI). A focused approach on maximizing personalization outcomes with limited resources and driving cost efficiencies with wise investment choices (see Figure 1) can help retailers drive significant value exchanges across the customer lifecycle.
The following strategies will help retailers make efficient use of data.
As marketers navigate a world where third-party cookies are increasingly restricted, zero-party data is gold.
Brands that prioritize zero-party data are better positioned to deliver personalized digital experiences while respecting customer privacy. However, they must avoid the trap of collecting more and leveraging less. They must leverage zero-party data effectively, focusing on transparent value exchange. Above all, retailers must use zero-party data with clear intention—improving customer retention, maximizing baskets, or improving customer lifetime value. They must align business goals with the overall customer experience and personalization strategies, which will significantly maximize personalization outcomes.